data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7468b/7468b81dc91645b97dbe2332ad402fa1086ab286" alt=""
The most obvious contribution of Le Donne’s
The
Wife of Jesus: Ancient Texts and Modern Scandals is his
demonstration of how Jesus’ sexuality (and marital status as part of that
larger matter) has been variously employed in different historical contexts,
including modern scholarship.
He thus
treats, for example, the
Gospel of Thomas, the
Gospel of Philip,
Mormon portrayals of a polygamous Jesus, Morton Smith’s possibly-gay Jesus from
Secret Mark, and the recent scandal surrounding the
(overwhelmingly-likely) fraudulent
Gospel of Jesus’ Wife.
(I was surprised that more attention was not
given to the Jesus Family Tomb phenomenon, though.)
Tying all these various portrayals of Jesus
in ancient and modern contexts together in a coherent narrative demonstrates
conclusively what I mentioned in the
earlier post—not knowing anything
historically about a putative wife of the historical Jesus does not mean that
there’s nothing interesting to say or study about such a figure and the
concomitant issue of Jesus’ sexuality.
In a sense, Le Donne demonstrates that those interested in Jesus from
various contexts have simply not been able to resist the topic.
His study makes a real contribution in this
regard to gender studies on the Bible as it shows that Jesus has, at times,
become a mirror reflection of the sexual anxieties and issues of a given
period.
In my next post, I will engage
some of his argument critically but in service of demonstrating the study’s
most
important contribution.
People talk about God with out respect, they should think what fear Jesus
ReplyDeleteHmm. Is there another part to that sentence coming?
Delete