On June 21, King’s College, London hosted a
day conference featuring presentations by James D. G. Dunn. Readers of this blog will recognize Professor
Emeritus Dunn as one of the preeminent New Testament scholars of our day. He has made invaluable contributions to
Pauline and Jesus studies. He is often
also included in the “memory” trend because of his huge and hugely-important Jesus Remembered (though he never really
engages memory theory in that book). Our
own Dr. Le Donne has the honor of being Prof. Dunn’s final PhD student at
Durham University.
I appreciated the kind invitation of the
New Testament folks at King’s College to come along and it was well worth the
time. Prof. Dunn gave two papers: “The Earliest Interpreters of Jesus
Tradition: John and Thomas”; “A New Perspective on the New Perspective on
Paul.” In the first lecture, he argues
that the Gospels of John and Thomas represent different types of developments
upon Synoptic (oral) Jesus tradition; John represents a development from within
while Thomas represents a development from without. In other words, John expands upon what is
already present in Synoptic (oral) tradition while Thomas simply adds stuff on
top of it that he got elsewhere. He
noted interestingly what he called “the paradox of John and Thomas”; namely,
that John is in the canon, Thomas is not, but that Thomas is often much closer
with the Synoptics than John.
The second paper argued that the New
Perspective is not really all that new at all and is, essentially, precisely
how Paul understood matters.
I hope that when my retirement comes, I can
be half as productive and insightful and Prof. Dunn. He’s currently a visiting Professor at King’s
College, London, so I hope the NT PhD students there are taking advantage of
his presence. If not, my goodness, buy
the man a cup of coffee!
Is it just me or has the era of great biblical scholars who travel around and draw big audiences hugely on the wane? Who in the next generation is on a trajectory like Dunn or NT Wright? Is the public losing interest? Have we entered the age of bronze?
ReplyDeleteI'd bring my screaming teenagers to see this guy:
Deletehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ken_Schenck
-anthony
I can't come up with any names.
DeleteWell, Bart Ehrman is "only" 57.
DeleteThe "next generation" of scholars needs to develop a sense of showmanship. Vote with colored beads. Follow the lead of Elaine Pagels and champion a second-century heresy (my vote is for Marcionism). Work on your catch phrases. Third Quest. New Perspective. Marginal Jew. For example, Chris could have titled his book "Why Jesus Can't Read".
Or you might become famously apostate. That works too.
How about Dr. Keith and Le Donne?
DeleteChris's goatee makes him a better villain than I.
Delete-anthony
I'm laughing out loud at both of the previous two posts. Unfortunately, the goatee is no more. And I think we both know that the sinister scholar market is really your territory, Anthony.
DeleteAs to Larry's suggestion, I think he's right. Ehrman probably is the biggest scholarly draw for the general public right now. My goodness, the day Anthony posted on him, the hits on this blog skyrocketed.
I have read ...Did the first Christians worship Jesus ? , authored by Dunn , then i read Larry Hurtado on the same topic .Both are top class New Testament scholars , both argue in in the opposite direction . Why is it like that ? , and who is right on the issue ?
ReplyDeleteKen
What do you think Ken?
Delete-anthony
Hurtado and Buckham both argue for a early high Christology , they say Paul ADAPTED the shema .
DeleteAccording to me they are wrong , what are your views Anthony and Kieth ?
Ken
Dear Ken,
DeleteI would do anything for love... but I won't do that.
-anthony
So it's already over?
ReplyDelete