tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8637125351921336084.post8792656189837432375..comments2024-03-19T00:26:30.753-07:00Comments on The Jesus Blog: Markus Bockmuehl on Watson’s Gospel Writing—Chris KeithAnthony Le Donnehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01282792648606976883noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8637125351921336084.post-60092297994038875642014-02-21T08:09:44.876-08:002014-02-21T08:09:44.876-08:00Any way to make the review available to us who don...Any way to make the review available to us who don't have a subscription to the journal? Benjamin T.https://www.blogger.com/profile/14913818403397237910noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8637125351921336084.post-32847867046621161202014-02-21T06:20:47.750-08:002014-02-21T06:20:47.750-08:00Thanks for this, Ferdie.Thanks for this, Ferdie.Chris Keithhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12007521996155910288noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8637125351921336084.post-53181495319217402822014-02-21T05:55:01.050-08:002014-02-21T05:55:01.050-08:00Chris, numerous issues raised in Bockmuehl's r...Chris, numerous issues raised in Bockmuehl's review came up during discussions here in Cambridge where Peter Head, Simon Gathercole, Steve Walton, and several PhD candidates have been working though Gospel Writing. In relation to Bockmuehl's discussion of Origen in his review, I make the following point: "there is no mention of Origen returning to empirical truth in combination with spiritual truth and harmonization in Cels., following his anti-harmonization paradigm implemented in Book 10 of his Comm. Jo. anywhere in Watson’s monograph. One would at least have expected a footnote about this, as Watson refers to Cels. elsewhere when it suites his argument". Ferdie Mulderhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01787003919964570351noreply@blogger.com