I would like to thank The Jesus Blog secretary for
extracting selected emails for me to read. Today’s email comes from Chris in
London:
Dear James,
my first question is
one I think lots will be thinking but just won't have the courage to ask. Namely,
you don't really look like a normal NT scholar, more, if I may say, like a
criminal. Not a small time gangsta, of course, more like a nemesis of Batman.
Given this, have you at least thought about being a criminal and if so, perhaps
we could go into business together, smuggling Routledge or Brill books into
local theological libraries?
Second, in your view
what is the next big thing in historical Jesus studies? Is there a movement or
paradigms shift on the horizon, or perhaps already well underway, that will
change the shape of this discipline?
Third, of all of your
many and great books, which do you think has been the most important? Which one
were you happiest to see in print, or which one “nailed it” best?
Chris
Dear Chris,
Thank you for your kind words.
Stealing, as I hope you are aware, is wrong. However,
property is also theft and I understand that people now have ways of sharing
electronic versions of books for free, much like people did with videos and pop
music in the 1980s. Was it really stealing to record your favourite songs off
the radio? I'm no ethical philosopher; I am merely the conduit for information. As for
such master criminals, did Žižek
not teach us that that, unlike the wealthy philanthropist, Batman, Bane
represents authentic, revolutionary love, willing to make sacrifices, and is the
personification of Occupy Wall Street?
The next big thing in historical Jesus studies? I
think it will be, and perhaps already is, memory studies of the sort that everyone on this blog
bar me has made a significant contribution. For me, some of the general ideas
have proven to be a helpful way of making ideas about what we mean about ‘the
historical Jesus’ much clearer. Instead of being able to answer questions like ‘did
he or did he not say or do this or that’ we might want to think more of a
chronology of perceptions. So, were these perceptions present in the 20s/30s?
Or were these ideas obviously later? I can’t prove whether Jesus did or did not
argue about washing hands or plucking grain but it is easier to make a case
that these were debates that could have been formulated in early perceptions of
Jesus.
I think some of the older debates about Jesus in relation to
material circumstances of Palestine will continue but underlying them are some
fairly obvious and perhaps immovable ideological positions of left and right represented in the
field, whether or not scholars realise it. I hope such debates go beyond ‘how oppressive
or not were Antipas and/or the Romans?’ to an understanding of historical
change where reactions and perception of material change can vary dramatically.
The idea that bad/good shit happened and people did/did not react is not
enough. That’s a change I’d like to see but I doubt it will happen because I don't think the interest is quite there.
My own books? I might say that I prefer whatever I have just written
but really I prefer the more overtly political things I have written. At the moment
I am probably most enjoying working on the Bible (including Jesus) in English
political discourse, both what I published (Harnessing
Chaos: The Bible in English Political Discourse since 1968) and what I
am continuing to do. There are plenty of reasons for this (no doubt many/all
autobiographical) but I particularly enjoy working on, with or in: something which is pretty
new in the field, loads of new data (for me and biblical scholars, anyway) and ongoing data to
analyse; new debating partners in different fields; an area where I think
biblical scholars are leading the way in the humanities; and freedom from the
old battles we all know about in traditional NT studies where positions can be
just too entrenched for debate.
Yours,
James
Ps. readers might be interested in the free and legal material
at Biblical Studies
Online.
_____
If you have a question to contribute to "Just Ask James" email DearDrCrossley@gmail.com.
This feature, by far, is my favorite part of this blog.
ReplyDeleteThis was fantastic.
ReplyDeleteAlways a great day, great day!, when one appeals to Slavoj Žižek in a post on a Jesus blog. Thank you DearDrJames!
ReplyDeleteLooks very useful.
ReplyDelete