tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8637125351921336084.post7391459714968829189..comments2024-03-15T10:01:59.405-07:00Comments on The Jesus Blog: Goodacre, the 'Matthew Effect," and Memory DistortionAnthony Le Donnehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01282792648606976883noreply@blogger.comBlogger8125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8637125351921336084.post-58004550405753115662015-11-14T23:07:16.083-08:002015-11-14T23:07:16.083-08:00So Mark/Mark knows but rejects Q?So Mark/Mark knows but rejects Q?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8637125351921336084.post-28847422322583721112015-11-13T10:30:38.856-08:002015-11-13T10:30:38.856-08:00I believe that Mark actually posted this comment t...I believe that Mark actually posted this comment this in pseudonymity.Anthony Le Donnehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01282792648606976883noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8637125351921336084.post-3368354444907806932015-11-13T09:58:45.891-08:002015-11-13T09:58:45.891-08:00Oh man, this is too much fun. Ok, here's my c...Oh man, this is too much fun. Ok, here's my contribution of a Goodacreism:<br /><br />"There is no hard evidence of its existence. In spite of the confidence with which scholars have reconstructed Q, and even claim to be able to give an account of its own literary history and development, no one has ever seen it. There is not even a fragment of any ancient manuscript of Q, nor is there a single reference to its existence anywhere in ancient literature. Nineteenth-century scholars believed that Papias was referring to Q in his statement that Matthew ‘compiled the logia in the Hebrew language.’"Chris Keithhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12007521996155910288noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8637125351921336084.post-5774595187266055052015-11-13T03:23:10.265-08:002015-11-13T03:23:10.265-08:00This example for that matter though, might work in...This example for that matter though, might work in more than one way.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8637125351921336084.post-83393349512711918072015-11-12T23:04:06.879-08:002015-11-12T23:04:06.879-08:00It's not entirely an anachronism to see a rela...It's not entirely an anachronism to see a relatvely modern Machiavellian state at work in the Roman period and Roman provinces.<br /><br />In empirical courts, odd things happen. Whether by accident or design, we cannot always say.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8637125351921336084.post-82662676937094409292015-11-12T13:50:25.694-08:002015-11-12T13:50:25.694-08:00"The question is not whether Brian is Jesus, ..."The question is not whether Brian is Jesus, But whether Jesus is Brian." <br /><br />This one is interesting. Because Mark actually said this. Though rumor is he was quoting from someone else.<br /><br />This is one common way that two different figures become conflated.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8637125351921336084.post-68925837417452977602015-11-12T11:46:37.533-08:002015-11-12T11:46:37.533-08:00If the writers of Matthew and Luke shared a lost, ...If the writers of Matthew and Luke shared a lost, hidden, or secret source, it can only have been because both worked for the Herodian Intelligence and Security Services, and the "asset" list with his name on it was very obviously lost in the Jewish War.Zeba Crookhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01015244423580703611noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8637125351921336084.post-40990505063895267722015-11-12T10:23:08.516-08:002015-11-12T10:23:08.516-08:00Maybe I'm taking this too seriously but...
&q...Maybe I'm taking this too seriously but...<br /><br />"The two-source hypothesis - when complicated by the addition of Proto- and Deutero-Mark, further sources, two versions of Q, Mark-Q overlaps, and Proto-Luke - can handle most of the material. Yet even with these complications difficulties remain. The two fatal ones are (1) the evidence that Luke knew Matthew (which not even the theories of Proto-Mark and Mark-Q overlaps entirely meet) and (2) the verbatim agreement between Mark and 'Q' in the supposed overlap passages. Of all the solutions, this one, which remains the dominant hypothesis, is least satisfactory."Michael Barberhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09245959720626825944noreply@blogger.com